Google stats confirm IPv6 traffic has officially crossed the 50% mark globally. What does the dev community think, and why should you stop ignoring it?

It only took 25 years, but hey, better late than never. We finally dragged our collective network cables past the 50% adoption mark for IPv6.
The word on the digital street (specifically over on Hacker News) is pointing to Google's official statistics page. The headline is simple but historically massive: IPv6 traffic hitting Google services globally has finally breached the 50% threshold.
If you've been in the tech game long enough, you've been hearing the "IPv4 is running out, IPv6 is the future" narrative since you were writing your first "Hello World". Yet, thanks to the miraculous (and monstrous) duct tape known as NAT (Network Address Translation), IPv4 managed to stay on life support for over two decades.
But you can only squeeze so much blood from a stone. With the explosion of IoT, 5G, and everyone owning three different smart devices, IPv4 is tapped out. Major ISPs are quietly rolling out IPv6 to end-users. Hell, if you want to grab some Free $300 to test VPS on Vultr or any other modern cloud provider, you'll notice IPv6 is often the default, and you're getting charged a premium if you want a dedicated IPv4 address.
While the specific HN thread didn't have a massive comment section to pull from immediately, the historical tech community consensus on IPv6 is easily split into three highly vocal camps:
Let's get one thing straight: IPv6 isn't some vaporware "hype" tech like half the Web3/Metaverse garbage we've seen lately. It is foundational infrastructure.
To all the Backend, DevOps, and SysAdmin folks out there—stop groaning. Yes, looking at a hexadecimal IP address feels like trying to read Matrix code while drunk. But you know what's worse? Debugging a bizarre network timeout issue in production because your stack doesn't play nice with an IPv6-only client.
Stop relying on NAT as a crutch. Start learning how to properly configure IPv6 routing and firewalls. Because when the servers go down and your clients are screaming, "It was a DNS issue" won't save you this time.
Sauce: